Who are we to dictate to others what foods they can eat?
by Mark LaRochelle
Washington Times, May 24, 1994

The full-page advertisement by the Animal Welfare Institute, et al., "Blood and Gore" (May 17 Page A5) demonstrates that these groups have too much money and not enough integrity.

The ad is designed to whip Americans into a jingoist frenzy against a certain foreign country, described as "bloody" and "outlaw." What did this country do: Blow up the World Trade Center? Conduct "ethnic cleansing" operations? Slaughter unarmed students at Tiananmen Square?

No, the monster that is supposed to rouse our hate is Norway, the greatest menace to the planet is Norway's Prime Minister Gro Harlem Bruntland. Her "crime": supporting scientifically regulated wildlife management that would permit sustainable use of abundant species, including non-endangered whales.

The ad, by a consortium of radical animal-rights groups, is full of disinformation. A few examples will have to suffice:

The RMP is a perfect example of international cooperation and conservation in the interest of sustainable development. Norway's minke whaling is legal, humane and in accord with the best available scientific knowledge. It poses no danger to the minks whale population of 1 million or so.

The groups sponsoring this ad are not worried about the costs of a boycott or trade war, because they are making money off the misery of others. For a mere $25 donation, the ad reveals, you can get your very own poster of sperm whales. They know that confusing heavily depleted whale species with the abundant minke whale makes fund-raising easier.

This attempt to dictate by force what kinds of meat other peoples may eat is an act of cultural imperialism. The ultimate irony would be for the administration to heed these anti-whaling activists and impose trade sanctions on Norway for killing whales, after having granted most favored nation status to China, which kills people.

In a shrinking world, the only hope for international peace and a sustainable future is toleration of cultural diversity and, as Mr. Clinton said last year, "a strong commitment to science-based international solutions to global conservation problems." The United States should vote to adopt the RMP at the annual IWC meeting this month.